Monday, January 03, 2005

 

How societies make disastrous decisions

Jared Diamond's op-ed for the New York Times over the weekend reminded me of another, more detailed piece that appeared on the Edge website in March 2003.

In that essay, Diamond outlines four simple reasons why societies make disastrous decisions:

He further dissects this list.

Reasons for failure to anticipate the problem include:


Reasons for failing to perceive a problem that has actually arrived include:


Reasons for failure to try to solve a problem that has been perceived are divided into "rational and "irrational" reasons, where "rational" and "irrational" are used in the economic sense. "Rational" reasons include:


"irrational" reasons include:


Reasons for failure to succeed in solving a problem that one does try to solve


Diamond concludes his March 2003 essay by saying:
All this may sound pessimistic, as if failure is the rule in human decision-making. In fact, of course that is not the case, in the environmental area as in business, academia, and other groups. Many human societies have anticipated, perceived, tried to solve, or succeeded in solving their environmental problems. For example, the Inca Empire, New Guinea Highlanders, 18th-century Japan, 19th-century Germany, and the paramount chiefdom of Tonga all recognized the risks that they faced from deforestation, and all adopted successful reforestation or forest management policies.

Thus, my reason for discussing failures of human decision-making is not my desire to depress you. Instead, I hope that, by recognizing the sign posts of failed decision making, we may become more consciously aware of how others have failed, and of what we need to do in order to get it right.
There are lessons for telecom policy here, I am certain.

Comments:
Good essay, amd the "more detailed piece" reminds me of another detailed piece that Diamond wrote about the ethnic differences in testes size for Nature.
 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?