Friday, June 02, 2006

 

Comments on comments

I've just published three comments on Another Anti-Network-Neutrality Distortion. I received these comments days ago, but I am not sorry about the delay. I only have so much bandwidth. Since these people are not "preferred customers," and since they understand the idea of tiered services, surely they will not mind. If they'd like future comments published with less delay, all they need to do is come work out a commercial arrangement with me.

Specific responses:

Comment 1 by NSP Strategist: Huh? Seriously I am having trouble understanding your point. NSP Strategist has made some good comments in the past, so I'm hoping that he or she will come back and explain further.

Comment 2 by Anonymous: You say, " The Barton bill in the House would actually create a national franchise, which would open up the telcos to true competition." Uh, the national franchise provision of COPE would open up cable TV to the telcos, so the cablecos would actually experience increased competition.

Comment 3 by Anonymous: You say, "Allowing the government to regulate an industry which has flourished while remaining free of red tape . . . " Which industry are you talking about? Telecommunications? Free of red tape? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha . . . ROTFLMAO.

Comments:
David, I think I cleared my comments up here on my blog:
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/06/isen-was-confused-with-my-comments.html
 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?