Thursday, April 05, 2007

 

What's with Infrastructure?

One of the most important articles in the news this week self-admits, "If there’s a less sexy story floating around, I can’t find it."

It is a story in today's NYT by Bob Herbert called, "Our Crumbling Foundation." Since it is behind the New York Times' paywall, and since it is so important, I'm reproducing the meat of it here.

. . . According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, the U.S. infrastructure is in sad shape, and it would take more than a trillion and a half dollars over a five-year period to bring it back to a reasonably adequate condition.

. . . as we learned with New Orleans, there are consequences to neglecting the infrastructure. Just a little over a year ago, a dam in Hawaii gave way, unleashing a wave 70 feet high and 200 yards wide. It swept away virtually everything in its path, including cars, houses and trees. Seven people drowned.

On the day after Christmas in Portland, Ore., a sinkhole opened up like something from a science fiction movie and swallowed a 25-ton sewer- repair truck. Authorities blamed the sinkhole on the collapse of aging underground pipes.
But infrastructure is about more than dams and sewers. Think Internet. Think education. Think climate. And think of the ideology that keeps us from investing in building and maintaining such critical public resources.
. . . the American infrastructure is growing increasingly old and obsolete. In addition to being an invitation to tragedy, this is a problem that is putting Americans at a disadvantage in the ever more competitive global economy.

Felix Rohatyn, the investment banker who helped save New York City from bankruptcy in the 1970s, has been prominent among those trying to sound the infrastructure alarm. Along with former Senator Warren Rudman, he has been criticizing the government’s unwillingness to invest adequately in public transportation systems, water projects, dams, schools, the electrical grid, and so on.

He recently told a House committee that Congress should begin a major effort to rebuild the American infrastructure “before it is too late.”

“Since the beginning of the republic,” he said, “transportation, infrastructure and education have played a central role in advancing the American economy, whether it was the canals in upstate New York, or the railroads that linked our heartland to our industrial centers; whether it was the opening of education to average Americans by land grant colleges and the G.I. bill, making education basic to American life; or whether it was the interstate highway system that ultimately connected all regions of the nation.

“This did not happen by chance, but was the result of major investments financed by the federal and state governments over the last century and a half. ... We need to make similar investments now.”

Politics and ideology are the main reasons that government has turned away from public investment over the past several years. Zealots marching under the banner of small government have been remarkably effective in thwarting efforts to raise taxes or borrow substantial sums for the kind of public investment that has always been essential to a dynamic economy.

That this is counterproductive in a post-20th-century world should be as obvious as the sun rising in the morning. There is a reason why countries like China and India are racing like mad to develop their infrastructure and educational capacity.

“A modern economy needs a modern platform, and that’s the infrastructure,” Mr. Rohatyn said in an interview. “It has been shown that the productivity of an economy is related to the quality of its infrastructure. For example, if you don’t have enough schools to teach your kids, or your kids are taught in schools that have holes in the ceilings, that are dilapidated, they’re not going to be as educated and as competitive in a world economy as they need to be.”

Mr. Rohatyn and Mr. Rudman are co-chairmen of the Commission on Public Infrastructure at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. They believe that failing to move quickly to address the nation’s infrastructure needs — through the establishment of a national trust fund, for example, or a federal capital budget — could lead to long-term disaster.

But words like trust fund and long-term and infrastructure find it very difficult to elbow their way into the nation’s consciousness . . .

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Comments:
Today we pooh-pooh hierarchy, bureaucracy, and government. Less is better. The result is that infrastructure becomes an economic externality. The resulting crumbling of education, roads, electric grids, even, perhaps, the internet itself, is our current tragedy of the commons.
 
Close down all overseas military bases and operations, kill the contracts for new planes that aren't needed, ditto warships etc, and slash the pentagon's budget accordingly. Take that money and the service people disbanded due to the base closures and put them to work rebuilding the infrastructure. Solves multiple problems all at once and would certainly pay for the infrastructure repairs in no time flat.
 
Good dig, and thanks to "band" for pointing this on out.

A recent "Soujourners" takes on a side of this question. In the qwest for the "smaller, more beautiful" world, we too often equate less with small. That's what we need from government; in order to keep it small, i'll take on the truly big projects.
 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?