Friday, June 27, 2008
Quote of Note: Chris Dodd on FISA
"Under the legislation before us, the district court would simply decide whether or not the telecommunication companies received documentation stating that the President authorized the program and that there had been some sort of determination that it was legal.
"But, as the Intelligence Committee has already made clear, we already KNOW that this happened.
"We already KNOW that the companies received some form of documentation, with some sort of legal determination.
"But that’s not the question. The question is not whether these companies received a “document” from the White House. The question is, “were their actions legal?” It’s rather straightforward—surprisingly uncomplicated.
"Either the companies were presented with a warrant, or they weren’t. Either the companies and the President acted outside of the rule of law, or they followed it. Either the underlying program was legal or it wasn’t.
"Because of this legislation, none of the questions will be answered, Mr. President. Because of this so-called “compromise,” the judge’s hands will be tied, and the outcome of these cases will be predetermined. Because of this compromise, retroactive immunity will be granted and that, as they say, will be that. Case closed.
"No court will rule on the legality of the telecommunications companies activities in participating in the president’s warrantless wiretapping program.
"None of our fellow Americans will have their day in court.
"What they will have is a government that has sanctioned lawlessness.
"Well, I refuse to accept that, Mr. President. I refuse to accept the argument that because this situation is just too delicate, too complicated, that this body is simply going to go ahead and sanction lawlessness.
"We are better than that."
Senator Christopher Dodd, D-CT, on the Senate floor, June 24, 2008. [Link to complete text of Dodd speech.]
"But, as the Intelligence Committee has already made clear, we already KNOW that this happened.
"We already KNOW that the companies received some form of documentation, with some sort of legal determination.
"But that’s not the question. The question is not whether these companies received a “document” from the White House. The question is, “were their actions legal?” It’s rather straightforward—surprisingly uncomplicated.
"Either the companies were presented with a warrant, or they weren’t. Either the companies and the President acted outside of the rule of law, or they followed it. Either the underlying program was legal or it wasn’t.
"Because of this legislation, none of the questions will be answered, Mr. President. Because of this so-called “compromise,” the judge’s hands will be tied, and the outcome of these cases will be predetermined. Because of this compromise, retroactive immunity will be granted and that, as they say, will be that. Case closed.
"No court will rule on the legality of the telecommunications companies activities in participating in the president’s warrantless wiretapping program.
"None of our fellow Americans will have their day in court.
"What they will have is a government that has sanctioned lawlessness.
"Well, I refuse to accept that, Mr. President. I refuse to accept the argument that because this situation is just too delicate, too complicated, that this body is simply going to go ahead and sanction lawlessness.
"We are better than that."
Senator Christopher Dodd, D-CT, on the Senate floor, June 24, 2008. [Link to complete text of Dodd speech.]
Technorati Tags: Bushco, ChrisDodd, Constitution, FourthAmendment, QuoteOfNote, Telco, Wiretap
Comments:
Post a Comment
